I have it(9000 Pro)!!

[Ambian]

Also theres a MX 200-400 or something like that... a friend has one<BR>im not talking about the 2 individual ones like theres a MX 200 and a MX 400<BR>this is a 200-400

[Juan]

I received my video card last night and I will tell you that card smoked the 7500 I had. I don't have the full version of 3dMark but with the basic version it gained a little over 2500 pts compared to the 7500. It is only the 64MB version but I highly recommend this card to anybody looking for an excellent card but with little to spend. I bought mine for 90.50 USD w/tax.

[Max Power]

Thats pretty good. Did you ue pricewatch? How do you know if its the real thing on there? the descriptions don't help much.

[Joe]

what was your actual 3dmark score? <BR><BR>max those are real .. all pricewatch is . is a price guide .. click the info on the site in the discription and you will be able to go to the site that has that product

[Juan]

I don't have it written down but I will post it tonight when I get home? It will probably be around 10:30-11PM because our server is screwed up here at work.

[Juan]

I'm sorry..it was a little over 1500 pts. My score was 7376 with the freedownload version of 3dMark. I'm to cheap to by the Pro edition.

[KinkyAfro]

Not a bad score m8! nice jump up from the 7500 <img src="i/expressions/face-icon-small-smile.gif" border="0"><BR><BR>btw, the 3DMark 2001 Pro version is no different.. just gives a results browser and some image quality tests. The score are still generated using just the 4 game tests.

[Juan]

I am going to run some more tests on it like using Glexcess that can be found at www.glexcess.com. Does anybody know where you can get the Quake benchmarks or is there a cheat that can tell you the fps? If anybody knows of any other benchmarks they would like to see with this card please tell me where to find them and I will try them for you!!!!<BR><BR>I did try to overclock it with PowerStrip but when it get to the Wavey Water test on 3dMark I would get a blue screen and the system would restart. I am going to mess with it some more and will update you guys on that.

[GNXtreme]

I need to be able to get some screen shots from 3DMark2001...can anyone help me with that...btw Juan...nice score!

[Joe]

7376 cant be right ??? .. i get 5000+ with my gf2 ti200 ... and the radeon 9000 is like .. lite years ahead of the gf2s lol

[Max Power]

the radeon 90000 is compairable to a geforce3ti200 (that is what u ment, right? there is no geforce2ti200) and the 9000 pro is like a geforce3ti500.

[Juan]

Thanks GNXtreme. Pimpin Joe that reallys is my score so have some hope for ATI...HaHaHa. I am going to try and overclock this bad boy tonight. I did find some ATI overclocker on warp2search.net or .org...I can't remember but I am going to try that one out tonight too. I will update you tomorrow morning hopefully!

[Juan]

Do any of you know how to install the DirectX9 beta? Everytime I try to install it I get an error saying it cannot find dsetup.dll or when I run the .msi it runs to a problem. If any of you know how PLEASE HELP!!!

[KinkyAfro]

<b>GNXtreme</b> hit F12 to take a screenshot in 3DMark.. save them as a .bmp somewhere I think.<BR><BR><BR><BR><b>Juan</b> I'd avoid DX9 for the time being if I were you, I've seen people have lots of problems with it. It shouldn't be too long before the final product is out I wouldn't have thought.

[GNXtreme]

Thanks KA...

[Juan]

I did raise the engine to 279.00Mhz and the memory to 280.75Mhz(561.50Mhz DDR). I scored 7456 on 3DMark. I tried raising both to 290 but at the Advanced Pixel Shader my system jumps to the blue screen and then restarts so I am going down in Mhz from there.

[Juan]

I FOUND IT!!!!!! Here is a link for anybody who wants DirectX 9 beta..It Works: <a target=new class=ftalternatingbarlinklarge href="http://www.winnews.info/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=522">Text</a>

[Joe]

<br><br><< <i>the radeon 90000 is compairable to a geforce3ti200 (that is what u ment, right? there is no geforce2ti200) and the 9000 pro is like a geforce3ti500.</i> >><br><br><BR><BR>OK well i accidently put 200 after the ti in the post .. so sue me lol ... but there where ti series of geforce 2's .. click the link below<BR><BR><a target=new class=ftalternatingbarlinklarge href="http://www.compuvest.com/engine/infowindow.asp?VisitorID=22090102971&page=2&itemname=18926&itemprice=53&c=845&d=AGP+64MB+AND+UP&cglobally=&dglobally=">CLICK ME!</a>

[Max Power]

There was The Geforce2 MX, MX100, MX200, MX400 GTS, TI, ULTRA. And I think that's it.

[Serialthriller]

ummm....i must be doing somethiing wrong with my ati 9000 pro...i only got a 4519 score....what res are you using and soforth....it scored about the same as my old gf2ti200 did....

[Juan]

After installing DirectX9 my scored droped to 7036. What are your system specs SerialThriller?

[Juan]

I use the Standard Settings on 3dMark. Your score sounds like GLExcess ratings. If you are using this benchmark it is only OpenGL.

[Juan]

ATI Catalyst 3 is out..I'll let you know what it does with the 9000.

[Juan]

I meant 2.3. Here is my score: <a target=new class=ftalternatingbarlinklarge href="http://service.madonion.com/servlet/Index?pageid=/orb/projectdetails&projectType=6&projectId=4466003">Text</a>

[Max Power]

cool

[MUSTANGPC]

I purchased an ATI-powered Creative RX9000PRO with 64MB on board and was told by another forum member that 8500LE with 128MB on board is better. Can someone comment on this. Many thanks.<BR>

[revvy]

you forgot the GeForce2 GO! 100 and 200 mobile solutions